I am doing a presentation for a course I am in as a post-doctoral research fellow. I was wondering if I might use your updated equity and equality graphics in it? I will certainly credit you.
Thanks!
]]>WOW a completely different perspective. Lots of valid points being made. It is good to see all sides to the opinions. I agree sometimes you are dont realize what you are encouraging… this could be an example of exactly that
]]>People standing on boxes to see over a fence is a dubious approach to viewing a game for which they had not paid admission. Tearing down the fence is vandalism and destruction of someone else’s property. Removing the fence altogether fundamentally changes the game being played inside the ballpark and demonstrates that once again, the cause is all about the people outside the fence and their whims, desires, and feelings of being left out, and no consideration for those who built the fence necessary for the playing of the game, or protecting the investment they made in the ballfields, the club, the players, etc.
]]>Oops, meant this link (though the earlier link is useful to help debunk it w/some NY data): http://bit.ly/1hG265C
]]>